Phosphoric Acid Filter Cloth for Horizontal Vacuum Belt Filters
In a wet-process phosphoric acid plant the belt filter has two products, not one: the filtrate that becomes product acid, and the washed gypsum cake that leaves. This page is about the acid side and the counter-current wash train — where the cloth decides how much soluble P2O5 you keep.
What the acid filter is actually separating
In wet-process phosphoric acid production, phosphate rock is attacked with sulphuric acid. Phosphoric acid goes into solution and calcium sulphate crystallises out of it. The filter stands between those two: it has to take the acid away as a clean filtrate, and it has to wash the soluble P2O5 out of the gypsum before the gypsum leaves the plant.
Because the rock is a fluorapatite, fluoride is released during the attack and travels with the liquor. So the fabric on this machine sits in hot acid that carries fluoride species, with residual sulphate, at whatever strength the route runs.
Which route the plant runs matters to the filter more than it first looks. Calcium sulphate crystallises as a dihydrate or as a hemihydrate depending on the temperature and acid strength the reaction is held at, and the hemihydrate routes run hotter and stronger than the dihydrate route. That choice sets the crystal the filter receives — and the filterability of a phosphoric acid cake is decided in the reactor, not on the belt. The cloth cannot rescue a bad crystal; it can only fail to exploit a good one.
One endless belt serves both duties on the same filter, and one specification covers it. The phosphogypsum page asks what happens to the cake you are throwing away. This page asks what happens to the acid and the wash liquor you are keeping. Read both before you specify — an enquiry that only describes the cake leaves the wash train unspecified.
Phosphogypsum filtration →Process flow across the belt
- 01 Attack / Reaction Phosphate rock is attacked with sulphuric acid. Phosphoric acid goes into solution; calcium sulphate crystallises out of it.
- 02 Cake Formation Slurry is distributed onto the moving cloth and the gypsum cake builds while the strongest liquor drains through.
- 03 Strong Filtrate The first vacuum zone drains product-strength acid into its own receiver, kept apart from every weaker filtrate.
- 04 Counter-current Wash Successive wash zones displace the liquor still held in the cake, each stage fed by the filtrate of the stage after it.
- 05 Dewatering A dry-vacuum zone pulls air through the washed cake before it reaches the discharge roller.
- 06 Cloth Wash / Return The cake releases, the cloth is washed on the return run and comes back to the feed end.
Operating values for each stage — liquor temperature, acid strength, solids, cake thickness, wash ratio — are plant-specific. We do not publish typical figures for them; they go on the confirmation list below instead.
Counter-current washing, and why the cloth sits in the middle of it
A horizontal vacuum belt filter is not one vacuum box. It is a sequence of zones, separated from each other, each draining into its own receiver so that filtrates of different strengths never mix. That separation is the whole design intent, and the cloth is the surface that has to hold it.
The wash runs counter-current to the cake. The freshest water enters at the last stage, and the filtrate collected under each stage becomes the wash liquor applied to the stage before it. Working backwards up the machine, each stage is washed with a liquor slightly stronger than the one after it, so the P2O5 that was displaced out of the cake climbs back towards the product instead of leaving with the gypsum. Only the strongest filtrate goes forward as product acid; the weaker ones are returned into the process.
That is the mechanism an engineer is buying when he buys this belt. If the cake cracks, if the fabric closes, if a zone leaks into its neighbour — the counter-current arrangement quietly stops working while the machine keeps turning.
Total wash water is bounded by the plant water balance and by the acid strength the plant has to produce downstream. More wash water means more dilution. This is the reason a blinding cloth on an acid filter is not a nuisance that can be managed by turning the wash up — the operator has nowhere to turn it up to.
Zone by zone
| Zone | What the cloth has to do there | Where that filtrate goes |
|---|---|---|
| Cake formation + strong filtrate | Forms an even, crack-free cake across the full belt width while draining at the highest rate of any zone. | Goes forward as product acid. |
| First wash stage | Holds that cake intact while the filtrate from the next stage displaces the liquor inside it. | Joins the product acid, or the strong-filtrate receiver, depending on plant design. |
| Intermediate wash stages | Keeps drainage uniform so each stage sees the same cake it was designed for. | Becomes the wash liquor of the stage before it. |
| Final wash stage | Takes the freshest wash water of the train onto the weakest liquor in the cake. | Becomes the wash liquor of the stage before it. |
| Dry / dewatering zone | Passes air through the washed cake without pulling the cake apart. | Weak liquor, returned into the process water balance. |
| Cloth wash, return run | The fabric itself is the thing being cleaned here, not the cake. | Into the plant water balance — which is why it is not a free lever. |
This is the general arrangement of a counter-current belt wash, described at industry level. The number of stages, the exact filtrate routing and what each receiver feeds are set by your plant's design — which is why the confirmation list asks you to count them rather than assuming them.
What makes the acid side hard on a belt
The difficulties below are the ones specific to running a wash train, as distinct from the general belt-duty difficulties that apply to any slurry on this machine. Polymer and finish have to be chosen against hot acid carrying fluoride, and that window is confirmed in writing for your duty rather than published here as a general figure.
-
Cake cracking kills the wash, not the filtration
A crack gives wash liquor a free path straight to the vacuum box. It runs through the crack instead of displacing liquor through the body of the cake.
Cloth implication: Vacuum and flow readings can look entirely normal while wash efficiency collapses. How evenly the cake forms and drains is a weave, finish and drainage question.
-
Soluble P2O5 leaving in the cake is money, not moisture
Whatever the wash train fails to displace leaves with the gypsum and reports to the stack.
Cloth implication: On the cake side of this machine poor washing shows up as a quality issue. On the acid side it shows up as yield, which is why the same belt gets judged by two different standards.
-
You cannot wash the problem away
Total wash water is bounded by the plant water balance and by the acid strength the plant has to produce. Adding wash water dilutes the product.
Cloth implication: A blinding cloth cannot be compensated for by turning up the wash. The fabric has to hold its drainage over the whole campaign.
-
Solids through the cloth report to the product acid
Anything that passes the fabric lands in the filtrate receiver and goes forward with the acid to whatever clarification and concentration follows.
Cloth implication: Retention is a specification on this duty, not a by-product of picking a weave for cake release.
-
Zone-to-zone leakage mixes filtrates that were deliberately separated
The whole point of the zone dividers is to keep strong liquor and weak wash apart. A leaking edge seal, an open seam or a wrinkled belt lets them meet.
Cloth implication: Every seam crosses every zone divider once per revolution. Seam type, squareness and edge treatment are therefore process variables here, not shop details.
-
Scale forms where conditions change
Gypsum and fluorosilicate species come out of solution as temperature, dilution and supersaturation shift — in the fabric, in the lines and in the boxes.
Cloth implication: Scaling closes open area from inside the yarn bundle, where a cloth wash reaches it least well.
How severe each one is on your machine depends on numbers we do not have yet — which is what the confirmation list is for. The general belt-duty difficulties that sit underneath all of this — tracking, cake release, edge wear — are set out on the phosphogypsum page and are not repeated here.
Machines observed in phosphate and fertilizer service
Rubber-belt horizontal vacuum belt filters are the dominant route on modern acid plants. The families below are the ones observed in phosphate and fertilizer service; the evidence level is stated as we found it, not upgraded.
| OEM family | Industries observed | Evidence level | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDRITZ Delkor HVBF | Mining, fertilizer | OBSERVED | Send brand + model |
| TAKRAF DELKOR HBF | Phosphate, iron, coal | OBSERVED claims | Send brand + model |
| HASLER Filtres Philippe | Fertilizer, hydromet, Li listed | OBSERVED | Send brand + model |
| EKCP EIMCO-KCP | IN FGD + phosphate | OBSERVED | Send brand + model |
| GKD HVBF equipment | Mining, Li / PGM, fertilizer | OBSERVED | Send brand + model |
Tilting-pan and table filters remain in service on phosphoric acid duty, and they are not a variant of this machine from a cloth point of view: they are washed in sectors, and the cloth is a set of shaped segments rather than one endless belt. If your acid filter is a pan filter, this page does not describe your consumable. Tell us the machine and we will say honestly whether we can help.
OEM names above are used only to identify the machine a cloth has to fit.
How the cloth is specified for acid duty
Selection runs backwards from the liquor and the wash train. The chemistry and temperature at the filter narrow the polymer; the crystal the reactor produces and the clarity your filtrate has to meet narrow the weave and the surface finish; the number of zones and the machine itself narrow the fabricated dimensions, the seam and the edge treatment. The candidate polymers for horizontal vacuum belt duty are PET monofilament, PET mono/multifilament combinations, polypropylene, double- and multi-layer weave constructions, and hydrolysis- or alkali-resistant specialities.
One point of general polymer engineering is worth stating plainly, because it is easy to get backwards: the well-known hydrolytic weakness of PET is hot alkaline service, not acid service. That is why an alumina or Bayer-liquor duty is a fundamentally different polymer problem from this one, and it is why the acid side of a phosphate plant is not automatically the hostile case people assume. It does not mean the polymer question is settled here — hot acid carrying fluoride, over a service life measured in months of continuous running, still has to be confirmed against your actual conditions.
What we will not do is tell you on a web page which polymer your acid belt should be. That decision belongs to your liquor, your route and your machine. A belt chosen from a published table filters acceptably and washes badly, and the wash is the part you get paid for.
Specification status
Our factory specification package has not been confirmed in writing yet, so every parameter reads UNKNOWN. Each one is fixed against your machine and liquor during the engineering review, and it is stated in the quotation — not inferred from this page.
| Parameter | Value | Unit | How it is fixed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polymer | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed against liquor chemistry and temperature at the filter |
| Weave / construction | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed against crystal habit, cake formation and wash duty |
| Air permeability | UNKNOWN | L/dm²/min | Test method and pressure stated with the value, once the factory package is confirmed |
| Retention / filtrate clarity class | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed against the filtrate specification you work to |
| Fabric weight | UNKNOWN | g/m² | Stated with the value, once the factory package is confirmed |
| Seam type | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed against machine, zone layout and seam photo |
| Edge treatment | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed against machine edge seal |
| Max fabricated width | UNKNOWN | mm | Confirmed against machine width |
| Continuous temperature limit | UNKNOWN | °C | Confirmed per polymer and finish |
| Chemical limit (hot acid / fluoride) | UNKNOWN | — | Confirmed per polymer and finish |
Industry reference — not our specification
| Parameter | Industry reference | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belt width seen on this machine family | up to 4.5–4.8 m | — (value carries its own unit) | Equipment-family reference, third-party machines — a family-level figure, not a measurement of ours |
This row describes the machine population, not what we can supply. Our own width limit is on the UNKNOWN list above until the factory confirms it. Belt width and circumference are yours to measure: how to measure your old belt →
What we can build for this duty
The parameter table above reads UNKNOWN because our own values are not confirmed in writing yet, and we will not fill that table with industry averages. This section is the other half of the answer: the options this cloth is actually built from, what each one changes, and which piece of your data decides it. Nothing below is a specification — it is the shape of the decision.
Cloth form An endless belt fabricated to your machine dimensions, crossing every zone divider in the wash train once per revolution.
Recommended material direction
Hot wet-process acid carrying fluoride and fluorosilicate species is the most chemically demanding of the belt duties on this site, and here the temperature is part of the chemistry rather than a separate axis. The hemihydrate routes run hotter and stronger than the dihydrate ones, which is why the route has to be settled before the polymer is.
This narrows the field; it does not pick. Which polymer goes on your machine is settled against your measured numbers and not on a web page — the same position the selection section above takes. What follows is the reasoning behind that position, not a departure from it.
- Polyester (PET) PET
Continuous reference up to ~150 °C — a published property of the polymer, not a value of ours
- Acid Good
- Alkali Limited
- Hydrolysis Limited
- Abrasion Excellent
Acid is not polyester's weak side — the hydrolysis problem it is known for is a hot alkaline problem, not an acid one — and its reference continuous temperature gives headroom that polypropylene does not have.
- Polypropylene PP
Continuous reference up to ~90 °C — a published property of the polymer, not a value of ours
- Acid Excellent
- Alkali Excellent
- Hydrolysis Excellent
- Abrasion Good
The better acid resistance of the two common polymers, and its constraint is entirely temperature. On a hemihydrate route the ceiling above is the question, not the chemistry.
- Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) PVDF
Continuous reference up to ~140 °C — a published property of the polymer, not a value of ours
- Acid Excellent
- Alkali Moderate
- Hydrolysis Excellent
- Abrasion Good
Halogen-bearing and strongly oxidising liquors are where a fluoropolymer earns its cost step. Note its weak side is strong alkali — the opposite of the usual assumption that a fluoropolymer resists everything.
- PA Acid attacks polyamide. Not a direction on this duty at any temperature.
What actually decides it Which route the plant runs — dihydrate, hemihydrate, or a hemi-dihydrate variant — and the liquor temperature and fluoride level measured at the filter rather than at the reactor.
Everything in this block is reasoning from published polymer behaviour applied to the chemistry described further up this page. It is a direction, not a selection — and the selection is made against your measured numbers during the engineering review, then written into the quotation. The full polymer envelope is on the materials page.
Weave options
The wash train is the product here: what the belt recovers is P2O5 that would otherwise leave with the cake. Wash efficiency is a structural property of the cloth before it is a process setting.
- Double layer / multi-layer Two or more interlaced fabric layers woven as one. A fine filtering face carried on a coarse structural back — high strength with fine retention, and drainage channels inside the fabric. Watch: Thicker and heavier; more expensive to weave. The usual answer on heavy belt duties.
- Twill The crossing point steps sideways each pick, giving a diagonal rib. More flexible and more permeable than plain at the same yarn count, with better cake release. Watch: Slightly less dimensionally stable than plain.
- Satin Long floats, few crossing points. The smoothest surface of the three, so the best cake release and the easiest to wash back. Watch: Floats snag and abrade; retention is coarser at a given yarn count.
The structure has to displace liquor evenly rather than let the wash channel through the path of least resistance, and it has to keep doing it while the cake profile changes down the machine.
Yarn form. Monofilament for release and wash-back; the finer retention of a multifilament is paid for with solids held inside the yarn bundle, which on a wash duty is a cost rather than a benefit.
Yarn form, weave and surface finish are settled as one decision. The four yarn forms available are monofilament, multifilament, mono + multi combination and staple / spun.
Permeability considerations
Air permeability is the figure everyone compares and the easiest one to quote meaninglessly. It is measured per ISO 9237 at a stated pressure drop — often 200 Pa — or per ASTM D737 (Frazier). A value with no stated pressure and no stated unit is not comparable to anything, including ours. The same applies to a pore or retention rating: on a woven cloth that is a nominal figure and not an absolute cut-off, because woven media do not have a single pore size and the cake quickly becomes the real filter.
On a multi-stage wash train the permeability that matters is the one the cloth still has at the last stage, not the one it had at the feed end. Ask for the method and the test pressure with any figure, ours included.
How each property is measured, and what to ask any supplier for alongside the number, is set out on the testing and inspection page. Naming the method is a fact about a public standard, not a claim about our laboratory.
Joint options
- Clipper (metal hook) Interlocking metal hooks crimped onto both cloth ends, joined by a pintle wire. Fitted and replaced on the machine without dismantling it. The fastest change-out. Watch: The joint is a discontinuity: it leaks vacuum as it passes the box, and it is where most belt failures start. Hook material has to suit the liquor.
- PAD / welded overlap The two ends are overlapped and thermally fused. A smoother, quieter joint that seals better than a clipper and carries load more evenly. Watch: Made off the machine or with a portable press; a change-out takes longer.
- Spiral Spiral coils on each end interlaced and pinned. Flexible, drains through the joint, distributes load along the full width. Watch: Adds an open line across the belt — not appropriate where the joint must seal.
Every seam crosses every zone divider once per revolution on this duty, so the joint is a process variable and not a shop detail. Hook material in a hot fluoride-bearing acid is a chemical decision; a welded overlap removes the metal from the equation and costs a longer change-out.
The four constructions drawn in cross-section: how joints fail and what each one costs you.
Edge treatment
- Cut and sealed The cut edge is thermally sealed against fraying. The baseline. Adequate where the machine edge seal is in good condition.
- Folded / hemmed The selvedge is folded back and secured. Adds thickness and stiffness at the edge where the seal rubs.
- Reinforced edge band A separate band is bonded along the selvedge. For machines that chew edges — the usual answer when a belt keeps failing at the edge while its body is sound.
- Coated / sealed band A polymer band is applied to the edge. Seals the edge against vacuum bypass as well as protecting it mechanically.
- Guide strip / tracking profile A profile bonded to the underside to run in the machine guide. Only where the machine is built for it. Fitting one to a machine that is not is a common and expensive mistake.
Seam type, squareness and edge treatment are process variables on this machine. A bypass at the edge does not just wet the cake, it puts wash water where the zone dividers were supposed to keep it out.
Relevant equipment
A filter belt is decided at the loom before it is decided anywhere else: what a weaving platform can hold — pick density, tension, width — sets what the finished cloth can be asked to do. Our weaving runs on DORNIER (Germany) and Sulzer (Switzerland) platforms, machines built for technical textiles rather than for apparel.
A wash-train belt is long as well as wide, and its developed length has to stay inside the take-up range once it is hot. That is settled by construction and heat setting, not by tensioning it harder on site.
Model designations, working widths and installed quantities are being confirmed against the machine nameplates and are not published until they are. A weaving platform is easy to name and hard to fake, and we would rather you were able to check.
The full platform description, the eleven process stations from yarn to crate, and the nine laboratory checks: manufacturing.
Factory capability for this duty
The rows below are the part of our capability envelope that this duty touches. The last group is the one that makes the rest of it worth reading — a supplier who can do everything has told you nothing.
Machine families
- Rubber-belt horizontal vacuum belt filter Built to your spec
Core family. Endless belt with clipper, PAD or spiral joint and a finished edge.
What decides it Brand and model, measured width and developed length, a photograph of the joint.
Cloth construction
- PET and PP Built to your spec
The two polymers most belt duties are built in.
What decides it Liquor pH, temperature and cleaning chemistry.
- PA, PPS, PVDF, PTFE Engineering review
Available as a direction where the duty genuinely needs them. Cost and lead time are the constraint.
What decides it Whether the duty actually needs them rather than PET or PP.
Fabrication
- Clipper, PAD / welded and spiral joints Built to your spec
Matched to the construction your machine is already set up for.
What decides it A close-up photograph of the existing joint, both faces.
Operating envelope
- Specific chemical species Engineering review
Assessed per species, not per industry label. Fluoride, chloride, oxidisers and solvents each behave differently.
What decides it What is actually in the liquor, including trace species you consider minor.
What we do not do
- OEM spare parts Not offered
Replacement cloth fabricated to your machine dimensions. Not an OEM spare part.
The full envelope, including the machine families and services we decline: what we build to order and what we will not take on. Fifteen pages on how a specification like this is built and read: the filter cloth specification guide.
How acid-duty belts get taken off the machine
On the cake side of this filter, a cloth can fail visibly. On the acid side it can fail on the numbers first: recovery slips, filtrate turns, and the belt itself still looks serviceable. That difference is worth knowing before you diagnose.
Wash efficiency drifting down
Process-side and cloth-side together: cake formation, crack behaviour and how much open area the fabric still has.
Cloudy strong filtrate
Cloth retention, a compromised seam, or an edge seal letting unfiltered liquor past. Tell the three apart before rebuying the same cloth.
Diagnose this →Seam / joint failure
Cloth-side and fabrication-side: seam type, squareness, and how the joint was closed on site.
Diagnose this →Belt tracking and wrinkling
Often machine-side (roller alignment, edge guides) before it is cloth-side — and a wrinkle is also a zone-seal problem here.
Diagnose this →Cloth life on a horizontal vacuum belt filter is duty-specific. Published third-party cases run from weeks to months depending on slurry and machine condition, and we do not quote a life figure before seeing your duty. On acid duty the more useful question is not how long the belt lasts but when its wash performance stops paying for itself — those are two different dates, and only the second one is on your P&L.
Measuring the old belt and photographing where it failed is the first step in telling cloth, machine and process causes apart. How to measure your old belt →
What we need from you to quote
This list is the engineering RFQ in plain form — what you gather here is exactly what the form asks for. Three items on it are specific to acid duty and are not asked on the gypsum side: the zone count, the process route, and the cloth wash arrangement. Without those we would be quoting a dewatering belt for a washing machine.
| What to confirm | How to get it |
|---|---|
| Machine brand and model | Copy it off the machine nameplate. “Unknown” is an acceptable answer. |
| Belt width | Measure the old cloth across the web, not the rubber transporter. |
| Belt length (circumference) | Measure the endless loop, or give us the machine centre distances. |
| Number of filtration and wash zones | Count the vacuum boxes and receivers along the machine. This is what makes your belt a wash-train belt. |
| Which zone the trouble shows up in | Formation, a named wash stage, or the dry zone. It points at a different cause in each case. |
| Process route | Dihydrate, hemihydrate or a two-stage route. It tells us the crystal and the temperature regime the fabric sits in. |
| Liquor temperature and acid strength at the filter | From the process sheet or a recent analysis — the value at the filter, not at the reactor outlet. |
| Cloth wash arrangement | What the cloth is washed with, at what point on the return run, and whether it is currently working. |
| Seam type in use now | Photograph the joint close up — clipper, PAD, or spiral. |
| Photos of the old cloth | Face and back, plus wherever it failed. This is the single most useful thing you can send. |
Before you enquire
Is this the same cloth as the phosphogypsum belt on the same filter?
On one machine, yes — it is one endless belt and one specification, so it is the same cloth on that machine. The pages are separate because the selection questions are separate. If you specify only against the gypsum cake, nothing in the enquiry constrains the wash train; if you specify only against the wash, nothing constrains cake release at the discharge roller. Send us both sides of the duty and it is one quotation.
What information do you need to quote an acid-duty belt filter cloth?
Machine brand and model, belt width and length, how many filtration and wash zones the machine has, the process route, the liquor temperature and acid strength at the filter, the seam type you run now, photographs of the old cloth and its joint, and what failed. If you have all of that, a quotation is straightforward. If you have only some of it, send what you have — we will tell you which missing item actually blocks the quote and which one we can work around.
Get an engineering quote for phosphoric acid duty
Three steps after you submit: an engineer checks what you sent against the machine, we come back for anything missing, and you get a quotation or a sample plan.
Every belt is fabricated to your machine dimensions — we quote per RFQ. No online checkout.
Samples available — freight terms confirmed per request.
Where to go next
Phosphogypsum Filtration
The cake side of the same filter: what happens to the gypsum after the wash train has finished with it.
HVBF Filter Cloth
The cloth family this duty uses: weave, polymer, seam, edge and width options.
FGD Gypsum Dewatering
A scrubber duty, not an acid-plant one — different origin, different chemistry, no wash train like this.
HVBF Compatibility
OEM families, what we can fit, and what we need from each machine.